ZENV

Technology

Zenvia Inc. · Software - Infrastructure · $20M

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
39.2
Average

Zenvia Inc. scores 39.2/100 using the Balanced preset.

21.4
Quality
35%
12.0
Moat
30%
35.2
Growth
20%
58.8
Risk
15%

ZENV — Key Takeaways

✅ Strengths

Zenvia Inc. shows attractive valuation relative to fundamentals

⚠️ Areas of Concern

Zenvia Inc. has below-average profitability metrics
Zenvia Inc. has limited competitive moat

ZENV — Score History

25303540Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 4, 202631.820.012.00.058.8100.00.0
Apr 3, 202631.820.012.00.058.8100.00.0
Apr 2, 202631.820.012.00.058.8100.0

ZENV — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

21.4/100 (25%)

Zenvia Inc. currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.

Capital Efficiency (ROIC)Weak

How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.

Return on EquityWeak

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Gross Profit / AssetsWeak

Asset productivity — how much gross profit each dollar of assets generates.

Cash GenerationStrong

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

35.2/100 (20%)

Zenvia Inc. shows steady but unspectacular growth, typical for mature companies.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

3Y Revenue CAGRWeak

Compound annual revenue growth rate over 3 years.

EPS GrowthWeak

Year-over-year earnings per share growth.

Forward Revenue OutlookWeak

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Forward EPS GrowthStrong

Analyst consensus for future earnings growth.

Risk

58.8/100 (15%)

Zenvia Inc. maintains a reasonable risk profile with manageable debt levels.

Financial LeverageStrong

Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.

Debt/EquityStrong

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioWeak

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

100.0/100 (15%)

Zenvia Inc. appears attractively valued relative to its earnings, cash flows, and sector peers.

Earnings YieldStrong

Inverse of forward P/E — higher yield means cheaper stock.

Price to Free Cash FlowStrong

How many years of FCF the market cap represents.

PEG RatioStrong

P/E relative to earnings growth — lower is more attractive.

Moat

12/100 (30%)

Zenvia Inc. operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for ZENV.

Score Composition

Quality
21.4×25%5.3
Growth
35.2×20%7.0
Risk
58.8×15%8.8
Valuation
100.0×15%15.0
Moat
12.0×30%3.6
Total
39.2Average

Unlock Full ZENV Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze ZENV in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the ZENV UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Zenvia Inc. is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Zenvia Inc.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Zenvia Inc. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.