VWAV

Industrials

VisionWave Holdings, Inc. · Aerospace & Defense · $90M

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
19.3
Weak

VisionWave Holdings, Inc. scores 19.3/100 using the Balanced preset.

40.0
Quality
35%
2.0
Moat
30%
0.0
Growth
20%
58.8
Risk
15%

VWAV — Key Takeaways

⚠️ Areas of Concern

VisionWave Holdings, Inc. has limited growth momentum
VisionWave Holdings, Inc. has limited competitive moat
VisionWave Holdings, Inc. has stretched valuation metrics

VWAV — Score History

10152025Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4Apr 5Apr 6Apr 7Apr 8
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 8, 202619.340.02.00.058.80.00.0
Apr 7, 202619.340.02.00.058.80.00.0
Apr 6, 202619.340.02.00.058.80.00.0
Apr 5, 202619.340.02.00.058.80.00.0
Apr 4, 202619.340.02.00.058.80.00.0
Apr 3, 202619.340.02.00.058.80.00.0
Apr 2, 202619.340.02.00.058.80.0

VWAV — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

40.0/100 (25%)

VisionWave Holdings, Inc. has average quality metrics, with room for improvement in margins or capital efficiency.

Capital Efficiency (ROIC)Strong

How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.

Return on EquityStrong

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Cash GenerationWeak

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

0.0/100 (20%)

VisionWave Holdings, Inc. faces growth headwinds with declining or stagnant revenue trends.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

EPS GrowthWeak

Year-over-year earnings per share growth.

Forward Revenue OutlookWeak

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Risk

58.8/100 (15%)

VisionWave Holdings, Inc. maintains a reasonable risk profile with manageable debt levels.

Financial LeverageStrong

Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.

Debt/EquityStrong

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioWeak

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

0.0/100 (15%)

VisionWave Holdings, Inc. appears expensively valued relative to its fundamentals and growth prospects.

Moat

2/100 (30%)

VisionWave Holdings, Inc. operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for VWAV.

Score Composition

Quality
40.0×25%10.0
Growth
0.0×20%0.0
Risk
58.8×15%8.8
Valuation
0.0×15%0.0
Moat
2.0×30%0.6
Total
19.3Weak

Unlock Full VWAV Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze VWAV in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the VWAV UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for VisionWave Holdings, Inc. is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses VisionWave Holdings, Inc.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether VisionWave Holdings, Inc. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.