UMAC

Financial Services

Unusual Machines, Inc. · Shell Companies · $530M

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
36.8
Average

Unusual Machines, Inc. scores 36.8/100 using the Balanced preset.

0.0
Quality
35%
7.0
Moat
30%
100.0
Growth
20%
100.0
Risk
15%

UMAC — Key Takeaways

✅ Strengths

Unusual Machines, Inc. shows solid revenue and earnings growth trajectory
Unusual Machines, Inc. shows conservative financial structure with manageable risk

⚠️ Areas of Concern

Unusual Machines, Inc. has below-average profitability metrics
Unusual Machines, Inc. has limited competitive moat
Unusual Machines, Inc. has stretched valuation metrics

UMAC — Score History

30354045Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4Apr 5Apr 6Apr 7Apr 8
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 8, 202636.80.07.0100.0100.00.00.0
Apr 7, 202636.80.07.0100.0100.00.00.0
Apr 6, 202636.80.07.0100.0100.00.00.0
Apr 5, 202636.80.07.0100.0100.00.00.0
Apr 4, 202636.80.07.0100.0100.00.00.0
Apr 3, 202636.80.07.0100.0100.00.00.0
Apr 2, 202636.80.07.0100.0100.00.0

UMAC — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

0.0/100 (25%)

Unusual Machines, Inc. currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.

Return on EquityWeak

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Cash GenerationWeak

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

100.0/100 (20%)

Unusual Machines, Inc. is growing rapidly with strong revenue and earnings expansion.

Recent Revenue TrendStrong

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

EPS GrowthStrong

Year-over-year earnings per share growth.

Forward Revenue OutlookStrong

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Risk

100.0/100 (15%)

Unusual Machines, Inc. carries minimal financial risk with conservative leverage and strong solvency.

Debt/EquityStrong

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioStrong

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageStrong

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

0.0/100 (15%)

Unusual Machines, Inc. appears expensively valued relative to its fundamentals and growth prospects.

Moat

7/100 (30%)

Unusual Machines, Inc. operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for UMAC.

Score Composition

Quality
0.0×25%0.0
Growth
100.0×20%20.0
Risk
100.0×15%15.0
Valuation
0.0×15%0.0
Moat
7.0×30%2.1
Total
36.8Average

Unlock Full UMAC Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze UMAC in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the UMAC UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Unusual Machines, Inc. is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Unusual Machines, Inc.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Unusual Machines, Inc. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.