TAVI

Financial Services

Tavia Acquisition Corp. · Shell Companies · $170M

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
23.8
Weak

Tavia Acquisition Corp. scores 23.8/100 using the Balanced preset.

5.1
Quality
35%
0.0
Moat
30%
63.1
Growth
20%
36.4
Risk
15%

TAVI — Key Takeaways

✅ Strengths

Tavia Acquisition Corp. shows solid revenue and earnings growth trajectory

⚠️ Areas of Concern

Tavia Acquisition Corp. has below-average profitability metrics
Tavia Acquisition Corp. has limited competitive moat
Tavia Acquisition Corp. has stretched valuation metrics

TAVI — Score History

15202530Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4Apr 5Apr 6Apr 7Apr 8
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 8, 202623.85.10.063.136.429.70.0
Apr 7, 202623.85.10.063.136.429.70.0
Apr 6, 202623.85.10.063.136.429.70.0
Apr 5, 202623.85.10.063.136.429.70.0
Apr 4, 202623.85.10.063.136.429.70.0
Apr 3, 202623.85.10.063.136.429.70.0
Apr 2, 202623.85.10.063.136.429.7

TAVI — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

5.1/100 (25%)

Tavia Acquisition Corp. currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.

Return on EquityWeak

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Cash GenerationWeak

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

63.1/100 (20%)

Tavia Acquisition Corp. demonstrates healthy growth trends across revenue and earnings.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

EPS GrowthStrong

Year-over-year earnings per share growth.

Forward Revenue OutlookStrong

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Risk

36.4/100 (15%)

Tavia Acquisition Corp. has some risk factors including moderate leverage or solvency concerns.

Debt/EquityStrong

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioWeak

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

29.7/100 (15%)

Tavia Acquisition Corp. appears expensively valued relative to its fundamentals and growth prospects.

Earnings YieldWeak

Inverse of forward P/E — higher yield means cheaper stock.

Moat

0/100 (30%)

Tavia Acquisition Corp. operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for TAVI.

Score Composition

Quality
5.1×25%1.3
Growth
63.1×20%12.6
Risk
36.4×15%5.5
Valuation
29.7×15%4.5
Moat
0.0×30%0.0
Total
23.8Weak

Unlock Full TAVI Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze TAVI in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the TAVI UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Tavia Acquisition Corp. is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Tavia Acquisition Corp.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Tavia Acquisition Corp. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.