SOND

Consumer Cyclical

Sonder Holdings Inc. · Travel Lodging

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
17.2
Weak

Sonder Holdings Inc. scores 17.2/100 using the Balanced preset.

18.6
Quality
35%
6.0
Moat
30%
37.7
Growth
20%
23.5
Risk
15%

SOND — Key Takeaways

⚠️ Areas of Concern

Sonder Holdings Inc. has below-average profitability metrics
Sonder Holdings Inc. has elevated risk from leverage or valuation
Sonder Holdings Inc. has limited competitive moat
Sonder Holdings Inc. has stretched valuation metrics

SOND — Score History

101520253035Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4Apr 6Apr 7Apr 8
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 8, 202628.218.650.037.723.50.00.0
Apr 7, 202628.218.650.037.723.50.00.0
Apr 6, 202628.218.650.037.723.50.0+12.9
Apr 4, 202615.320.06.00.058.80.00.0
Apr 3, 202615.320.06.00.058.80.00.0
Apr 2, 202615.320.06.00.058.80.0

SOND — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

18.6/100 (25%)

Sonder Holdings Inc. currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.

Capital Efficiency (ROIC)Weak

How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.

Return on EquityModerate

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Gross Profit / AssetsModerate

Asset productivity — how much gross profit each dollar of assets generates.

Cash GenerationWeak

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

37.7/100 (20%)

Sonder Holdings Inc. shows steady but unspectacular growth, typical for mature companies.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

3Y Revenue CAGRStrong

Compound annual revenue growth rate over 3 years.

EPS GrowthStrong

Year-over-year earnings per share growth.

Forward Revenue OutlookWeak

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Risk

23.5/100 (15%)

Sonder Holdings Inc. presents elevated risk with concerns around leverage or financial stability.

Financial LeverageWeak

Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.

Debt/EquityStrong

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioWeak

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

0.0/100 (15%)

Sonder Holdings Inc. appears expensively valued relative to its fundamentals and growth prospects.

Moat

6/100 (30%)

Sonder Holdings Inc. operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for SOND.

Score Composition

Quality
18.6×25%4.7
Growth
37.7×20%7.5
Risk
23.5×15%3.5
Valuation
0.0×15%0.0
Moat
6.0×30%1.8
Total
17.2Weak

Unlock Full SOND Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze SOND in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the SOND UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Sonder Holdings Inc. is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Sonder Holdings Inc.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Sonder Holdings Inc. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.