RDIB

Communication Services

Reading International, Inc. · Entertainment · $40M

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
29.8
Weak

Reading International, Inc. scores 29.8/100 using the Balanced preset.

18.3
Quality
35%
8.0
Moat
30%
49.6
Growth
20%
58.8
Risk
15%

RDIB — Key Takeaways

⚠️ Areas of Concern

Reading International, Inc. has below-average profitability metrics
Reading International, Inc. has limited competitive moat
Reading International, Inc. has stretched valuation metrics

RDIB — Score History

1520253035Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4Apr 5Apr 6Apr 7Apr 8
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 8, 202629.818.38.049.658.830.10.0
Apr 7, 202629.818.38.049.658.830.1+4.9
Apr 6, 202624.920.08.041.158.86.00.0
Apr 5, 202624.920.08.041.158.86.00.0
Apr 4, 202624.920.08.041.158.85.90.0
Apr 3, 202624.920.08.041.158.85.90.0
Apr 2, 202624.920.08.041.158.85.9

RDIB — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

18.3/100 (25%)

Reading International, Inc. currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.

Capital Efficiency (ROIC)Weak

How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.

Return on EquityStrong

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Gross Profit / AssetsWeak

Asset productivity — how much gross profit each dollar of assets generates.

Cash GenerationWeak

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

49.6/100 (20%)

Reading International, Inc. shows steady but unspectacular growth, typical for mature companies.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

3Y Revenue CAGRWeak

Compound annual revenue growth rate over 3 years.

EPS GrowthStrong

Year-over-year earnings per share growth.

Forward Revenue OutlookWeak

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Forward EPS GrowthStrong

Analyst consensus for future earnings growth.

Risk

58.8/100 (15%)

Reading International, Inc. maintains a reasonable risk profile with manageable debt levels.

Financial LeverageStrong

Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.

Debt/EquityStrong

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioWeak

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

30.1/100 (15%)

Reading International, Inc. appears expensively valued relative to its fundamentals and growth prospects.

Earnings YieldWeak

Inverse of forward P/E — higher yield means cheaper stock.

PEG RatioModerate

P/E relative to earnings growth — lower is more attractive.

Moat

8/100 (30%)

Reading International, Inc. operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for RDIB.

Score Composition

Quality
18.3×25%4.6
Growth
49.6×20%9.9
Risk
58.8×15%8.8
Valuation
30.1×15%4.5
Moat
8.0×30%2.4
Total
29.8Weak

Unlock Full RDIB Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze RDIB in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the RDIB UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Reading International, Inc. is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Reading International, Inc.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Reading International, Inc. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.