RCAT

Technology

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. · Computer Hardware · $1B

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
26.1
Weak

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. scores 26.1/100 using the Balanced preset.

0.0
Quality
35%
11.0
Moat
30%
51.1
Growth
20%
47.1
Risk
15%

RCAT — Key Takeaways

⚠️ Areas of Concern

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has below-average profitability metrics
Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has limited competitive moat

RCAT — Score History

20253035Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4Apr 5Apr 6Apr 7Apr 8
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 8, 202626.10.011.051.147.140.20.0
Apr 7, 202626.10.011.051.147.140.20.0
Apr 6, 202626.10.011.051.147.140.20.0
Apr 5, 202626.10.011.051.147.140.2-0.2
Apr 4, 202626.30.011.051.147.141.70.0
Apr 3, 202626.30.011.051.147.141.70.0
Apr 2, 202626.30.011.051.147.141.7

RCAT — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

0.0/100 (25%)

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.

Capital Efficiency (ROIC)Weak

How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.

Return on EquityWeak

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Cash GenerationWeak

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

51.1/100 (20%)

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. shows steady but unspectacular growth, typical for mature companies.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

3Y Revenue CAGRWeak

Compound annual revenue growth rate over 3 years.

EPS GrowthWeak

Year-over-year earnings per share growth.

Forward Revenue OutlookStrong

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Forward EPS GrowthStrong

Analyst consensus for future earnings growth.

Risk

47.1/100 (15%)

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has some risk factors including moderate leverage or solvency concerns.

Financial LeverageWeak

Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.

Debt/EquityStrong

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioStrong

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

40.2/100 (15%)

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has a mixed valuation — some metrics suggest fair value while others appear stretched.

Earnings YieldWeak

Inverse of forward P/E — higher yield means cheaper stock.

PEG RatioStrong

P/E relative to earnings growth — lower is more attractive.

Moat

11/100 (30%)

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for RCAT.

Score Composition

Quality
0.0×25%0.0
Growth
51.1×20%10.2
Risk
47.1×15%7.1
Valuation
40.2×15%6.0
Moat
11.0×30%3.3
Total
26.1Weak

Unlock Full RCAT Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze RCAT in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the RCAT UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Red Cat Holdings, Inc.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Red Cat Holdings, Inc. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.