PWP
Financial ServicesPerella Weinberg Partners · Financial - Capital Markets · $2B
PWP — Key Takeaways
✅ Strengths
⚠️ Areas of Concern
PWP — Score History
| Date | UQS | Quality | Moat | Growth | Risk | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2026 | 40.7 | 14.6 | 23.0 | 68.6 | 45.8 | 71.1 | 0.0 |
| Apr 7, 2026 | 40.7 | 14.6 | 23.0 | 68.6 | 45.8 | 71.1 | 0.0 |
| Apr 6, 2026 | 40.7 | 14.6 | 23.0 | 68.6 | 45.8 | 71.1 | 0.0 |
| Apr 5, 2026 | 40.7 | 14.6 | 23.0 | 68.6 | 45.8 | 71.1 | +0.1 |
| Apr 4, 2026 | 40.6 | 14.6 | 23.0 | 68.6 | 45.8 | 70.4 | +0.2 |
| Apr 3, 2026 | 40.4 | 14.4 | 23.0 | 68.6 | 45.8 | 69.3 | 0.0 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 40.4 | 14.4 | 23.0 | 68.6 | 45.8 | 69.3 | — |
PWP — Pillar Breakdown
Quality
— 14.6/100 (25%)Perella Weinberg Partners currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.
Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.
Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.
Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.
Free cash flow relative to market value.
Growth
— 68.6/100 (20%)Perella Weinberg Partners demonstrates healthy growth trends across revenue and earnings.
Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.
Compound annual revenue growth rate over 3 years.
Year-over-year earnings per share growth.
Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.
Analyst consensus for future earnings growth.
Risk
— 45.8/100 (15%)Perella Weinberg Partners has some risk factors including moderate leverage or solvency concerns.
Total debt relative to shareholder equity.
Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.
Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.
Valuation
— 71.1/100 (15%)Perella Weinberg Partners trades at a reasonable valuation with decent earnings yield and FCF multiples.
Inverse of forward P/E — higher yield means cheaper stock.
How many years of FCF the market cap represents.
P/E relative to earnings growth — lower is more attractive.
Moat
— 23/100 (30%)Perella Weinberg Partners operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for PWP.
Score Composition
More Stock Analysis
How is the PWP UQS Score Calculated?
The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Perella Weinberg Partners is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.
Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.
Moat (25%) assesses Perella Weinberg Partners's competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.
Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.
Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.
Valuation (15%) measures whether Perella Weinberg Partners is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.
Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.