PSX

Energy

Phillips 66 · Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · $71B

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
45.7
Average

Phillips 66 scores 45.7/100 using the Balanced preset.

35.7
Quality
35%
36.0
Moat
30%
45.0
Growth
20%
42.9
Risk
15%

PSX — Key Takeaways

✅ Strengths

Phillips 66 shows attractive valuation relative to fundamentals

⚠️ Areas of Concern

Phillips 66 has below-average profitability metrics
Phillips 66 has limited competitive moat

PSX — Score History

40455055Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4Apr 5Apr 6Apr 7Apr 8
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 8, 202645.735.736.045.042.981.90.0
Apr 7, 202645.735.736.045.042.981.9+0.1
Apr 6, 202645.635.736.044.842.981.90.0
Apr 5, 202645.635.736.044.842.981.90.0
Apr 4, 202645.635.736.044.842.982.00.0
Apr 3, 202645.635.736.044.842.982.00.0
Apr 2, 202645.635.736.044.842.982.0

PSX — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

35.7/100 (25%)

Phillips 66 has average quality metrics, with room for improvement in margins or capital efficiency.

Capital Efficiency (ROIC)Weak

How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.

Return on EquityStrong

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Gross Profit / AssetsWeak

Asset productivity — how much gross profit each dollar of assets generates.

Cash GenerationModerate

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

45.0/100 (20%)

Phillips 66 shows steady but unspectacular growth, typical for mature companies.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

3Y Revenue CAGRWeak

Compound annual revenue growth rate over 3 years.

EPS GrowthStrong

Year-over-year earnings per share growth.

Forward Revenue OutlookWeak

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Forward EPS GrowthStrong

Analyst consensus for future earnings growth.

Risk

42.9/100 (15%)

Phillips 66 has some risk factors including moderate leverage or solvency concerns.

Financial LeverageModerate

Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.

Debt/EquityStrong

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioWeak

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

81.9/100 (15%)

Phillips 66 appears attractively valued relative to its earnings, cash flows, and sector peers.

Earnings YieldStrong

Inverse of forward P/E — higher yield means cheaper stock.

Price to Free Cash FlowModerate

How many years of FCF the market cap represents.

PEG RatioStrong

P/E relative to earnings growth — lower is more attractive.

Moat

36/100 (30%)

Phillips 66 possesses some competitive advantages but faces meaningful competition. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for PSX.

Score Composition

Quality
35.7×25%8.9
Growth
45.0×20%9.0
Risk
42.9×15%6.4
Valuation
81.9×15%12.3
Moat
36.0×30%10.8
Total
45.7Average

Unlock Full PSX Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze PSX in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the PSX UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Phillips 66 is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Phillips 66's competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Phillips 66 is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.