PSIG

Industrials

PS International Group Ltd. · Integrated Freight & Logistics · $20M

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
9.7
Weak

PS International Group Ltd. scores 9.7/100 using the Balanced preset.

0.0
Quality
35%
6.0
Moat
30%
0.0
Growth
20%
54.6
Risk
15%

PSIG — Key Takeaways

⚠️ Areas of Concern

PS International Group Ltd. has below-average profitability metrics
PS International Group Ltd. has limited growth momentum
PS International Group Ltd. has limited competitive moat
PS International Group Ltd. has stretched valuation metrics

PSIG — Score History

051015Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4Apr 5Apr 6Apr 7Apr 8
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 8, 20269.70.06.00.054.60.00.0
Apr 7, 20269.70.06.00.054.60.00.0
Apr 6, 20269.70.06.00.054.60.00.0
Apr 5, 20269.70.06.00.054.60.00.0
Apr 4, 20269.70.06.00.054.60.00.0
Apr 3, 20269.70.06.00.054.60.00.0
Apr 2, 20269.70.06.00.054.60.0

PSIG — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

0.0/100 (25%)

PS International Group Ltd. currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.

Capital Efficiency (ROIC)Weak

How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.

Return on EquityWeak

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Cash GenerationWeak

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

0.0/100 (20%)

PS International Group Ltd. faces growth headwinds with declining or stagnant revenue trends.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

Forward Revenue OutlookWeak

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Risk

54.6/100 (15%)

PS International Group Ltd. has some risk factors including moderate leverage or solvency concerns.

Financial LeverageModerate

Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.

Debt/EquityStrong

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioModerate

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

0.0/100 (15%)

PS International Group Ltd. appears expensively valued relative to its fundamentals and growth prospects.

Moat

6/100 (30%)

PS International Group Ltd. operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for PSIG.

Score Composition

Quality
0.0×25%0.0
Growth
0.0×20%0.0
Risk
54.6×15%8.2
Valuation
0.0×15%0.0
Moat
6.0×30%1.8
Total
9.7Weak

Unlock Full PSIG Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze PSIG in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the PSIG UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for PS International Group Ltd. is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses PS International Group Ltd.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether PS International Group Ltd. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.