PLG

Basic Materials

Platinum Group Metals Ltd. · Other Precious Metals · $220M

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
13.2
Weak

Platinum Group Metals Ltd. scores 13.2/100 using the Balanced preset.

0.0
Quality
35%
7.0
Moat
30%
5.9
Growth
20%
68.7
Risk
15%

PLG — Key Takeaways

✅ Strengths

Platinum Group Metals Ltd. shows conservative financial structure with manageable risk

⚠️ Areas of Concern

Platinum Group Metals Ltd. has below-average profitability metrics
Platinum Group Metals Ltd. has limited growth momentum
Platinum Group Metals Ltd. has limited competitive moat
Platinum Group Metals Ltd. has stretched valuation metrics

PLG — Score History

5101520Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4Apr 5Apr 6Apr 7Apr 8
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 8, 202613.20.07.05.968.70.00.0
Apr 7, 202613.20.07.05.968.70.00.0
Apr 6, 202613.20.07.05.968.70.00.0
Apr 5, 202613.20.07.05.968.70.00.0
Apr 4, 202613.20.07.05.968.70.00.0
Apr 3, 202613.20.07.05.968.70.00.0
Apr 2, 202613.20.07.05.968.70.0

PLG — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

0.0/100 (25%)

Platinum Group Metals Ltd. currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.

Capital Efficiency (ROIC)Weak

How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.

Return on EquityWeak

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Cash GenerationWeak

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

5.9/100 (20%)

Platinum Group Metals Ltd. faces growth headwinds with declining or stagnant revenue trends.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

EPS GrowthWeak

Year-over-year earnings per share growth.

Forward Revenue OutlookWeak

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Risk

68.7/100 (15%)

Platinum Group Metals Ltd. maintains a reasonable risk profile with manageable debt levels.

Financial LeverageModerate

Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.

Debt/EquityStrong

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioStrong

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

0.0/100 (15%)

Platinum Group Metals Ltd. appears expensively valued relative to its fundamentals and growth prospects.

Moat

7/100 (30%)

Platinum Group Metals Ltd. operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for PLG.

Score Composition

Quality
0.0×25%0.0
Growth
5.9×20%1.2
Risk
68.7×15%10.3
Valuation
0.0×15%0.0
Moat
7.0×30%2.1
Total
13.2Weak

Unlock Full PLG Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze PLG in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the PLG UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Platinum Group Metals Ltd.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Platinum Group Metals Ltd. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.