MSFT
TechnologyMicrosoft Corporation · Software - Infrastructure · $3.1T
MSFT Price History
+76.6% over 5Y
Monthly close, adjusted for stock splits and dividend reinvestment.
What if I invested in Microsoft Corporation?
Based on Microsoft Corporation's historical closing prices, adjusted for stock splits and dividend reinvestment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is for informational purposes only and is not financial advice.
Unlock Full MSFT Analysis
Sign in to unlock the detailed analysis behind the UQS Score.
- ✓Detailed 6-pillar UQS breakdown with exact scores
- ✓All 29 metrics with sector-calibrated comparisons
- ✓6 investor presets (Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Wood, Graham, Balanced)
- ✓Watchlist tracking with score alerts
- ✓AI-generated investment perspectives across 6 preset views
- ✓Score history chart with change notifications
Pro Analysis
MSFT — Score History
| Date | UQS | Quality | Moat | Growth | Risk | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 68.8 | 72.6 | 85.0 | 44.4 | 75.1 | 61.5 | +1.2 |
| May 7, 2026 | 67.6 | 72.8 | 85.0 | 43.6 | 70.2 | 59.2 | 0.0 |
| May 4, 2026 | 67.6 | 72.8 | 85.0 | 43.6 | 70.2 | 59.1 | +0.1 |
| May 3, 2026 | 67.5 | 72.8 | 85.0 | 43.3 | 70.2 | 59.0 | +0.2 |
| May 2, 2026 | 67.3 | 72.8 | 85.0 | 43.3 | 70.2 | 58.0 | +0.3 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | 67.0 | 72.8 | 85.0 | 42.1 | 70.2 | 57.5 | 0.0 |
| Apr 26, 2026 | 67.0 | 72.8 | 85.0 | 42.2 | 70.2 | 57.5 | 0.0 |
| Apr 23, 2026 | 67.0 | 72.8 | 85.0 | 42.2 | 70.2 | 57.2 | 0.0 |
| Apr 22, 2026 | 67.0 | 72.8 | 85.0 | 42.1 | 70.2 | 57.3 | -0.2 |
| Apr 21, 2026 | 67.2 | 72.8 | 85.0 | 42.1 | 70.2 | 58.4 | +0.2 |
MSFT — Pillar Breakdown
Quality
— 72.7/100 (25%)Microsoft Corporation shows solid profitability with healthy returns on capital and reasonable margins.
How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.
Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.
Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.
Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.
Asset productivity — how much gross profit each dollar of assets generates.
Free cash flow relative to market value.
Growth
— 44.3/100 (20%)Microsoft Corporation shows steady but unspectacular growth, typical for mature companies.
Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.
Compound annual revenue growth rate over 3 years.
Year-over-year earnings per share growth.
Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.
Analyst consensus for future earnings growth.
Risk
— 75.1/100 (15%)Microsoft Corporation carries minimal financial risk with conservative leverage and strong solvency.
Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.
Total debt relative to shareholder equity.
Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.
Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.
Valuation
— 61.8/100 (15%)Microsoft Corporation trades at a reasonable valuation with decent earnings yield and FCF multiples.
Inverse of forward P/E — higher yield means cheaper stock.
How many years of FCF the market cap represents.
P/E relative to earnings growth — lower is more attractive.
Enterprise value multiple relative to sector median.
Moat
— 85/100 (25%)Microsoft Corporation benefits from powerful competitive advantages creating significant barriers to entry. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for MSFT.
Score Composition
Financial Data
More Stock Analysis
How is the MSFT UQS Score Calculated?
The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Microsoft Corporation is calculated using a proprietary 6-pillar framework with 29 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector. Momentum is an optional Pro toggle — without it, you get the 5-pillar / 25-metric core shown below.
Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.
Moat (25%) assesses Microsoft Corporation's competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.
Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.
Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.
Valuation (15%) measures whether Microsoft Corporation is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.
Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.