Is MHLA a buy according to UQS?

UQS rates MHLA as Poor at 1.5/100. Every pillar except Moat scores 0.0, with Moat itself reaching only 6.0/100. The rating reflects TTM revenue of $0M, ROE of -402.6%, operating margin of -204.8% versus a sector median of 15.5%, and interest coverage of -1.4x. The Poor label is the lowest classification in the UQS five-range scale.

What is MHLA's PEG ratio and what does it mean?

MHLA's PEG ratio is reported as 0.00, which is not analytically meaningful in this context — the issuer has negative earnings and zero forward revenue growth, making the ratio mathematically undefined as a valuation signal. The earnings yield of -14.3% and negative P/E of -7.0 better reflect the distressed fundamental profile. See the [PEG ratio explainer](/learn/peg-ratio) for standard interpretation.

Why might MHLA's UQS Score change?

The UQS Score is recalculated daily using TTM financial data and forward analyst estimates. For MHLA, any change would require improvement in revenue generation, profitability metrics such as operating margin or ROE, or a reduction in leverage as measured by debt-to-equity. Changes in analyst forward estimates for revenue or earnings would also affect the Growth and Valuation pillars. Score movements of five or more points trigger a page refresh.

MHLA

Financial Services

Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6.625 NT 2046 · Insurance - Property & Casualty · $1B

UQS Score — Balanced Preset

1.6

Poor

Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6.625 NT 2046 scores 1.6/100 using the Balanced preset.

UQS vs Financial Services Sector

MHLA

1.6

Sector avg

39.7

Quality

Weak

Moat

Weak

Growth

Weak

Risk

Weak

Valuation

Elevated

What is Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6.625 NT 2046?

Maiden Holdings provides non-catastrophic reinsurance products to small and mid-size insurance companies, operating primarily through property and casualty reinsurance segments.

The company offers customized reinsurance solutions through two segments: Diversified Reinsurance, covering a broad property and casualty portfolio, and AmTrust Reinsurance, handling business ceded by AmTrust to Maiden Bermuda. Revenue is generated by assuming insurance risk from ceding companies.

Is MHLA a Good Stock to Buy?

UQS Score rates MHLA as Poor overall, with Weak signals across quality, moat, growth, and risk, and an Elevated valuation.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. UQS Score is based on fundamental data and is not a buy/sell recommendation.

Unlock Full MHLA Analysis

✓View exact UQS pillar scores across all five dimensions
✓Access detailed financial metrics and risk indicators
✓Compare MHLA against sector peers in the Financial Services space
✓Get the complete analyst-grade quality profile for Pro members

Analyze MHLA in Detail →

Pro Analysis

MHLA — Score History

Score changes· 2 most recent

Date	UQS	Quality	Moat	Growth	Risk	Value	Change
May 12, 2026	1.6	0.0	6.0	0.4	0.0	0.0	+0.1
Apr 2, 2026	1.5	0.0	6.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	—

MHLA — Pillar Breakdown

◆

Quality

— 0.0/100 (25%)

Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6.625 NT 2046 currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.

Return on EquityWeak

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Cash GenerationWeak

Free cash flow relative to market value.

▲

Growth

— 0.4/100 (20%)

Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6.625 NT 2046 faces growth headwinds with declining or stagnant revenue trends.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

3Y Revenue CAGRWeak

Compound annual revenue growth rate over 3 years.

EPS GrowthWeak

Year-over-year earnings per share growth.

Forward Revenue OutlookWeak

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

◈

Risk

— 0.0/100 (15%)

Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6.625 NT 2046 presents elevated risk with concerns around leverage or financial stability.

Debt/EquityWeak

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioWeak

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

●

Valuation

— 0.0/100 (15%)

Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6.625 NT 2046 appears expensively valued relative to its fundamentals and growth prospects.

⬡

Moat

— 6/100 (25%)

Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6.625 NT 2046 operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for MHLA.

Score Composition

Quality

0.0×25%0.0

Growth

0.4×20%0.1

Risk

0.0×15%0.0

Valuation

0.0×15%0.0

Moat

6.0×25%1.5

Total

1.6Poor

Financial Data

More Stock Analysis

How is the MHLA UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6.625 NT 2046 is calculated using a proprietary 6-pillar framework with 29 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector. Momentum is an optional Pro toggle — without it, you get the 5-pillar / 25-metric core shown below.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6.625 NT 2046's competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6.625 NT 2046 is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.