MBWM
Financial ServicesMercantile Bank Corporation · Banks - Regional · $890M
MBWM — Key Takeaways
✅ Strengths
⚠️ Areas of Concern
MBWM — Score History
| Date | UQS | Quality | Moat | Growth | Risk | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2026 | 37.6 | 61.9 | 22.0 | 22.0 | 18.4 | 63.4 | 0.0 |
| Apr 7, 2026 | 37.6 | 61.9 | 22.0 | 22.0 | 18.4 | 63.4 | 0.0 |
| Apr 6, 2026 | 37.6 | 61.9 | 22.0 | 22.0 | 18.4 | 63.4 | 0.0 |
| Apr 5, 2026 | 37.6 | 61.9 | 22.0 | 22.0 | 18.4 | 63.4 | -0.1 |
| Apr 4, 2026 | 37.7 | 61.9 | 22.0 | 22.0 | 18.4 | 63.5 | 0.0 |
| Apr 3, 2026 | 37.7 | 61.9 | 22.0 | 22.0 | 18.4 | 63.5 | 0.0 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 37.7 | 61.9 | 22.0 | 22.0 | 18.4 | 63.5 | — |
MBWM — Pillar Breakdown
Quality
— 61.9/100 (25%)Mercantile Bank Corporation shows solid profitability with healthy returns on capital and reasonable margins.
Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.
Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.
Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.
Free cash flow relative to market value.
Growth
— 22.0/100 (20%)Mercantile Bank Corporation faces growth headwinds with declining or stagnant revenue trends.
Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.
Compound annual revenue growth rate over 3 years.
Year-over-year earnings per share growth.
Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.
Analyst consensus for future earnings growth.
Risk
— 18.4/100 (15%)Mercantile Bank Corporation presents elevated risk with concerns around leverage or financial stability.
Total debt relative to shareholder equity.
Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.
Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.
Valuation
— 63.4/100 (15%)Mercantile Bank Corporation trades at a reasonable valuation with decent earnings yield and FCF multiples.
Inverse of forward P/E — higher yield means cheaper stock.
How many years of FCF the market cap represents.
P/E relative to earnings growth — lower is more attractive.
Moat
— 22/100 (30%)Mercantile Bank Corporation operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for MBWM.
Score Composition
More Stock Analysis
How is the MBWM UQS Score Calculated?
The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Mercantile Bank Corporation is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.
Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.
Moat (25%) assesses Mercantile Bank Corporation's competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.
Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.
Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.
Valuation (15%) measures whether Mercantile Bank Corporation is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.
Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.