MB

Consumer Cyclical

MasterBeef Group · Restaurants · $100M

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
30.6
Weak

MasterBeef Group scores 30.6/100 using the Balanced preset.

41.8
Quality
35%
8.0
Moat
30%
60.0
Growth
20%
26.0
Risk
15%

MB — Key Takeaways

✅ Strengths

MasterBeef Group shows solid revenue and earnings growth trajectory

⚠️ Areas of Concern

MasterBeef Group has elevated risk from leverage or valuation
MasterBeef Group has limited competitive moat
MasterBeef Group has stretched valuation metrics

MB — Score History

25303540Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4Apr 5Apr 6Apr 7Apr 8
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 8, 202630.641.88.060.026.015.0-0.1
Apr 7, 202630.742.08.060.026.015.20.0
Apr 6, 202630.742.08.060.026.015.20.0
Apr 5, 202630.742.08.060.026.015.20.0
Apr 4, 202630.742.08.060.026.015.20.0
Apr 3, 202630.742.08.060.026.015.2+0.3
Apr 2, 202630.441.28.060.026.014.5

MB — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

41.8/100 (25%)

MasterBeef Group has average quality metrics, with room for improvement in margins or capital efficiency.

Capital Efficiency (ROIC)Weak

How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.

Return on EquityStrong

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Cash GenerationStrong

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

60.0/100 (20%)

MasterBeef Group demonstrates healthy growth trends across revenue and earnings.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

Forward Revenue OutlookStrong

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Risk

26.0/100 (15%)

MasterBeef Group presents elevated risk with concerns around leverage or financial stability.

Financial LeverageModerate

Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.

Debt/EquityWeak

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioWeak

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

15.0/100 (15%)

MasterBeef Group appears expensively valued relative to its fundamentals and growth prospects.

Earnings YieldWeak

Inverse of forward P/E — higher yield means cheaper stock.

Moat

8/100 (30%)

MasterBeef Group operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for MB.

Score Composition

Quality
41.8×25%10.4
Growth
60.0×20%12.0
Risk
26.0×15%3.9
Valuation
15.0×15%2.3
Moat
8.0×30%2.4
Total
30.6Weak

Unlock Full MB Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze MB in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the MB UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for MasterBeef Group is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses MasterBeef Group's competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether MasterBeef Group is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.