MARA
Financial ServicesMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc. · Financial - Capital Markets · $5B
MARA Price History
-54.7% over 5Y
Monthly close, adjusted for stock splits and dividend reinvestment.
What if I invested in Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.?
Based on Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.'s historical closing prices, adjusted for stock splits and dividend reinvestment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is for informational purposes only and is not financial advice.
Unlock Full MARA Analysis
Sign in to unlock the detailed analysis behind the UQS Score.
- ✓Detailed 6-pillar UQS breakdown with exact scores
- ✓All 29 metrics with sector-calibrated comparisons
- ✓6 investor presets (Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Wood, Graham, Balanced)
- ✓Watchlist tracking with score alerts
- ✓AI-generated investment perspectives across 6 preset views
- ✓Score history chart with change notifications
Pro Analysis
MARA — Score History
| Date | UQS | Quality | Moat | Growth | Risk | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2026 | 37.5 | 10.6 | 10.0 | 54.6 | 42.6 | 100.0 | +7.5 |
| May 7, 2026 | 30.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 45.9 | 31.5 | 90.3 | +0.1 |
| May 5, 2026 | 29.9 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 45.9 | 31.5 | 90.0 | -0.1 |
| Apr 26, 2026 | 30.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 46.5 | 31.5 | 90.0 | -0.2 |
| Apr 19, 2026 | 30.2 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 46.9 | 31.5 | 90.5 | -0.7 |
| Apr 18, 2026 | 30.9 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 46.9 | 31.5 | 95.2 | +14.3 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 16.6 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 46.9 | 31.5 | 0.0 | — |
MARA — Pillar Breakdown
Quality
— 10.6/100 (25%)Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.
Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.
Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.
Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.
Free cash flow relative to market value.
Growth
— 54.6/100 (20%)Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. shows steady but unspectacular growth, typical for mature companies.
Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.
Compound annual revenue growth rate over 3 years.
Year-over-year earnings per share growth.
Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.
Risk
— 42.6/100 (15%)Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. has some risk factors including moderate leverage or solvency concerns.
Total debt relative to shareholder equity.
Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.
Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.
Valuation
— 100.0/100 (15%)Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. appears attractively valued relative to its earnings, cash flows, and sector peers.
Enterprise value multiple relative to sector median.
Moat
— 10/100 (25%)Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for MARA.
Score Composition
Financial Data
More Stock Analysis
How is the MARA UQS Score Calculated?
The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. is calculated using a proprietary 6-pillar framework with 29 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector. Momentum is an optional Pro toggle — without it, you get the 5-pillar / 25-metric core shown below.
Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.
Moat (25%) assesses Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.
Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.
Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.
Valuation (15%) measures whether Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.
Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.