KEEL

Technology

Keel Infrastructure Corp. · Software - Services · $3B

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
25.2
Poor

Keel Infrastructure Corp. scores 25.2/100 using the Balanced preset.

UQS vs Technology Sector
KEEL
25.2
Sector avg
38.0
Quality
Weak
Moat
Neutral
Growth
Weak
Risk
Good
Valuation
Elevated

Unlock Full KEEL Analysis

Sign in to unlock the detailed analysis behind the UQS Score.

  • Detailed 6-pillar UQS breakdown with exact scores
  • All 29 metrics with sector-calibrated comparisons
  • 6 investor presets (Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Wood, Graham, Balanced)
  • Watchlist tracking with score alerts
  • AI-generated investment perspectives across 6 preset views
  • Score history chart with change notifications
Analyze KEEL in Detail →

Pro Analysis

KEEL — Score History

101520253035Apr 12Apr 29May 16Jun 2Jun 19Jul 6Jul 8v5
Score changes· 6 most recent
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Jul 4, 202625.20.050.013.267.00.0+5.3
Jun 19, 202619.90.050.013.231.70.0-5.3
May 27, 202625.20.050.013.267.00.0+4.5
May 8, 202620.70.050.013.236.90.0-4.9
Apr 19, 202625.60.050.013.269.60.0+0.2
Apr 12, 202625.40.050.024.853.00.0

KEEL — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

0.0/100 (25%)

Keel Infrastructure Corp. currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.

Capital Efficiency (ROIC)Weak

How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.

Return on EquityWeak

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Cash GenerationWeak

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

13.2/100 (20%)

Keel Infrastructure Corp. faces growth headwinds with declining or stagnant revenue trends.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

3Y Revenue CAGRWeak

Compound annual revenue growth rate over 3 years.

EPS GrowthWeak

Year-over-year earnings per share growth.

Forward Revenue OutlookWeak

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Risk

67.0/100 (15%)

Keel Infrastructure Corp. maintains a reasonable risk profile with manageable debt levels.

Financial LeverageStrong

Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.

Debt/EquityWeak

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioStrong

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

0.0/100 (15%)

Keel Infrastructure Corp. appears expensively valued relative to its fundamentals and growth prospects.

Moat

50/100 (25%)

Keel Infrastructure Corp. possesses some competitive advantages but faces meaningful competition. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for KEEL.

Score Composition

Quality
0.0×25%0.0
Growth
13.2×20%2.6
Risk
67.0×15%10.0
Valuation
0.0×15%0.0
Moat
50.0×25%12.5
Total
25.2Poor

Financial Data

More Stock Analysis

How is the KEEL UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Keel Infrastructure Corp. is calculated using a proprietary 6-pillar framework with 29 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector. Momentum is an optional Pro toggle — without it, you get the 5-pillar / 25-metric core shown below.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Keel Infrastructure Corp.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Keel Infrastructure Corp. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.