HYAC

Financial Services

Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III · Shell Companies · $320M

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
38.2
Average

Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III scores 38.2/100 using the Balanced preset.

46.5
Quality
35%
2.0
Moat
30%
27.1
Growth
20%
46.8
Risk
15%

HYAC — Key Takeaways

✅ Strengths

Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III shows attractive valuation relative to fundamentals

⚠️ Areas of Concern

Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III has limited growth momentum
Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III has limited competitive moat

HYAC — Score History

30354045Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4Apr 5Apr 6Apr 7Apr 8
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 8, 202638.246.52.027.146.890.6+0.2
Apr 7, 202638.046.42.027.146.890.0+0.3
Apr 6, 202637.745.92.027.146.888.20.0
Apr 5, 202637.745.92.027.146.888.20.0
Apr 4, 202637.745.92.027.146.888.20.0
Apr 3, 202637.745.92.027.146.888.2+0.4
Apr 2, 202637.345.62.027.146.886.5

HYAC — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

46.5/100 (25%)

Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III has average quality metrics, with room for improvement in margins or capital efficiency.

Return on EquityStrong

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityModerate

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Cash GenerationModerate

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

27.1/100 (20%)

Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III faces growth headwinds with declining or stagnant revenue trends.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

EPS GrowthStrong

Year-over-year earnings per share growth.

Forward Revenue OutlookWeak

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Risk

46.8/100 (15%)

Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III has some risk factors including moderate leverage or solvency concerns.

Debt/EquityStrong

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioWeak

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

90.6/100 (15%)

Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III appears attractively valued relative to its earnings, cash flows, and sector peers.

Earnings YieldStrong

Inverse of forward P/E — higher yield means cheaper stock.

Price to Free Cash FlowStrong

How many years of FCF the market cap represents.

Moat

2/100 (30%)

Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for HYAC.

Score Composition

Quality
46.5×25%11.6
Growth
27.1×20%5.4
Risk
46.8×15%7.0
Valuation
90.6×15%13.6
Moat
2.0×30%0.6
Total
38.2Average

Unlock Full HYAC Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze HYAC in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the HYAC UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III's competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.