GLXY.TO

Financial Services

Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. · Financial - Capital Markets · $11B

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
30.3
Weak

Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. scores 30.3/100 using the Balanced preset.

19.2
Quality
35%
28.0
Moat
30%
23.7
Growth
20%
42.6
Risk
15%

GLXY.TO — Key Takeaways

⚠️ Areas of Concern

Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. has below-average profitability metrics
Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. has limited growth momentum
Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. has limited competitive moat

GLXY.TO — Score History

2530354045Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4Apr 6
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 6, 202635.819.350.023.742.649.1+5.5
Apr 4, 202630.319.428.023.742.649.1-0.1
Apr 3, 202630.419.428.023.842.649.10.0
Apr 2, 202630.419.428.023.842.649.1

GLXY.TO — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

19.2/100 (25%)

Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.

Return on EquityModerate

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Cash GenerationWeak

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

23.7/100 (20%)

Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. faces growth headwinds with declining or stagnant revenue trends.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

EPS GrowthWeak

Year-over-year earnings per share growth.

Forward Revenue OutlookWeak

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Forward EPS GrowthStrong

Analyst consensus for future earnings growth.

Risk

42.6/100 (15%)

Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. has some risk factors including moderate leverage or solvency concerns.

Debt/EquityWeak

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioModerate

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageStrong

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

49.1/100 (15%)

Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. has a mixed valuation — some metrics suggest fair value while others appear stretched.

Earnings YieldWeak

Inverse of forward P/E — higher yield means cheaper stock.

PEG RatioStrong

P/E relative to earnings growth — lower is more attractive.

Moat

28/100 (30%)

Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for GLXY.TO.

Score Composition

Quality
19.2×25%4.8
Growth
23.7×20%4.7
Risk
42.6×15%6.4
Valuation
49.1×15%7.4
Moat
28.0×30%8.4
Total
30.3Weak

Unlock Full GLXY.TO Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze GLXY.TO in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the GLXY.TO UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.