GLOO

Technology

Gloo Holdings, Inc. · Software - Application · $130M

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
11.6
Weak

Gloo Holdings, Inc. scores 11.6/100 using the Balanced preset.

0.0
Quality
35%
6.0
Moat
30%
0.0
Growth
20%
67.2
Risk
15%

GLOO — Key Takeaways

✅ Strengths

Gloo Holdings, Inc. shows conservative financial structure with manageable risk

⚠️ Areas of Concern

Gloo Holdings, Inc. has below-average profitability metrics
Gloo Holdings, Inc. has limited growth momentum
Gloo Holdings, Inc. has limited competitive moat
Gloo Holdings, Inc. has stretched valuation metrics

GLOO — Score History

5101520Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4Apr 5Apr 6Apr 7Apr 8
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 8, 202611.60.06.00.067.20.00.0
Apr 7, 202611.60.06.00.067.20.00.0
Apr 6, 202611.60.06.00.067.20.00.0
Apr 5, 202611.60.06.00.067.20.00.0
Apr 4, 202611.60.06.00.067.20.00.0
Apr 3, 202611.60.06.00.067.20.00.0
Apr 2, 202611.60.06.00.067.20.0

GLOO — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

0.0/100 (25%)

Gloo Holdings, Inc. currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.

Capital Efficiency (ROIC)Weak

How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.

Return on EquityWeak

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Cash GenerationWeak

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

0.0/100 (20%)

Gloo Holdings, Inc. faces growth headwinds with declining or stagnant revenue trends.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

Forward Revenue OutlookWeak

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Risk

67.2/100 (15%)

Gloo Holdings, Inc. maintains a reasonable risk profile with manageable debt levels.

Financial LeverageModerate

Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.

Debt/EquityStrong

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioStrong

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

0.0/100 (15%)

Gloo Holdings, Inc. appears expensively valued relative to its fundamentals and growth prospects.

Moat

6/100 (30%)

Gloo Holdings, Inc. operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for GLOO.

Score Composition

Quality
0.0×25%0.0
Growth
0.0×20%0.0
Risk
67.2×15%10.1
Valuation
0.0×15%0.0
Moat
6.0×30%1.8
Total
11.6Weak

Unlock Full GLOO Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze GLOO in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the GLOO UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Gloo Holdings, Inc. is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Gloo Holdings, Inc.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Gloo Holdings, Inc. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.