FRT
Real EstateFederal Realty Investment Trust · REIT - Retail · $9B
FRT — Key Takeaways
✅ Strengths
⚠️ Areas of Concern
FRT — Score History
| Date | UQS | Quality | Moat | Growth | Risk | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2026 | 49.5 | 83.8 | 49.0 | 32.2 | 21.0 | 44.8 | 0.0 |
| Apr 7, 2026 | 49.5 | 83.8 | 49.0 | 32.2 | 21.0 | 44.8 | 0.0 |
| Apr 6, 2026 | 49.5 | 83.8 | 49.0 | 32.2 | 21.0 | 44.8 | 0.0 |
| Apr 5, 2026 | 49.5 | 83.8 | 49.0 | 32.2 | 21.0 | 44.8 | +1.7 |
| Apr 4, 2026 | 47.8 | 73.1 | 49.0 | 42.5 | 13.6 | 44.9 | 0.0 |
| Apr 3, 2026 | 47.8 | 73.1 | 49.0 | 42.5 | 13.6 | 44.9 | -0.1 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 47.9 | 73.2 | 49.0 | 42.5 | 13.6 | 45.1 | — |
FRT — Pillar Breakdown
Quality
— 83.8/100 (25%)Federal Realty Investment Trust demonstrates outstanding capital efficiency and profitability, placing it among the highest-quality businesses in the market.
Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.
Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.
Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.
Free cash flow relative to market value.
Growth
— 32.2/100 (20%)Federal Realty Investment Trust faces growth headwinds with declining or stagnant revenue trends.
Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.
Compound annual revenue growth rate over 3 years.
Year-over-year earnings per share growth.
Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.
Analyst consensus for future earnings growth.
Risk
— 21.0/100 (15%)Federal Realty Investment Trust presents elevated risk with concerns around leverage or financial stability.
Total debt relative to shareholder equity.
Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.
Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.
Valuation
— 44.8/100 (15%)Federal Realty Investment Trust has a mixed valuation — some metrics suggest fair value while others appear stretched.
Inverse of forward P/E — higher yield means cheaper stock.
How many years of FCF the market cap represents.
Moat
— 49/100 (30%)Federal Realty Investment Trust possesses some competitive advantages but faces meaningful competition. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for FRT.
Score Composition
More Stock Analysis
How is the FRT UQS Score Calculated?
The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Federal Realty Investment Trust is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.
Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.
Moat (25%) assesses Federal Realty Investment Trust's competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.
Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.
Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.
Valuation (15%) measures whether Federal Realty Investment Trust is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.
Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.