FORTY

Technology

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. · Information Technology Services · $2B

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
50.1
Below Average

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. scores 50.1/100 using the Balanced preset.

UQS vs Technology Sector
FORTY
50.1
Sector avg
38.0
Quality
Neutral
Moat
Weak
Growth
Weak
Risk
Good
Valuation
Attractive

Unlock Full FORTY Analysis

Sign in to unlock the detailed analysis behind the UQS Score.

  • Detailed 6-pillar UQS breakdown with exact scores
  • All 29 metrics with sector-calibrated comparisons
  • 6 investor presets (Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Wood, Graham, Balanced)
  • Watchlist tracking with score alerts
  • AI-generated investment perspectives across 6 preset views
  • Score history chart with change notifications
Analyze FORTY in Detail →

Pro Analysis

FORTY — Score History

354045505560Apr 2Apr 12Apr 22May 2May 12May 22May 24v5
Score changes· 5 most recent
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
May 12, 202650.155.324.022.172.3100.0+7.9
May 9, 202642.241.324.00.072.3100.0-3.7
Apr 5, 202645.938.624.022.172.3100.00.0
Apr 3, 202645.938.524.022.172.3100.00.0
Apr 2, 202645.938.624.022.172.3100.0

FORTY — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

55.3/100 (25%)

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. shows solid profitability with healthy returns on capital and reasonable margins.

Capital Efficiency (ROIC)Weak

How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.

Return on EquityStrong

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityStrong

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Gross Profit / AssetsWeak

Asset productivity — how much gross profit each dollar of assets generates.

Cash GenerationStrong

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

22.1/100 (20%)

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. faces growth headwinds with declining or stagnant revenue trends.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

3Y Revenue CAGRWeak

Compound annual revenue growth rate over 3 years.

EPS GrowthStrong

Year-over-year earnings per share growth.

Forward Revenue OutlookWeak

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Risk

72.3/100 (15%)

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. maintains a reasonable risk profile with manageable debt levels.

Financial LeverageStrong

Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.

Debt/EquityStrong

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioModerate

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

100.0/100 (15%)

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. appears attractively valued relative to its earnings, cash flows, and sector peers.

Earnings YieldStrong

Inverse of forward P/E — higher yield means cheaper stock.

Price to Free Cash FlowStrong

How many years of FCF the market cap represents.

EV/EBITDA vs SectorStrong

Enterprise value multiple relative to sector median.

Moat

24/100 (25%)

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for FORTY.

Score Composition

Quality
55.3×25%13.8
Growth
22.1×20%4.4
Risk
72.3×15%10.8
Valuation
100.0×15%15.0
Moat
24.0×25%6.0
Total
50.1Below Average

Financial Data

More Stock Analysis

How is the FORTY UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is calculated using a proprietary 6-pillar framework with 29 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector. Momentum is an optional Pro toggle — without it, you get the 5-pillar / 25-metric core shown below.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.