FLL
Consumer CyclicalFull House Resorts, Inc. · Gambling, Resorts & Casinos · $90M
FLL — Key Takeaways
⚠️ Areas of Concern
FLL — Score History
| Date | UQS | Quality | Moat | Growth | Risk | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2026 | 12.1 | 8.2 | 12.0 | 33.8 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Apr 7, 2026 | 12.1 | 8.2 | 12.0 | 33.8 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Apr 6, 2026 | 12.1 | 8.2 | 12.0 | 33.8 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Apr 5, 2026 | 12.1 | 8.2 | 12.0 | 33.8 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Apr 4, 2026 | 12.1 | 8.2 | 12.0 | 33.8 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Apr 3, 2026 | 12.1 | 8.2 | 12.0 | 33.8 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 12.1 | 8.2 | 12.0 | 33.8 | 2.1 | 0.0 | — |
FLL — Pillar Breakdown
Quality
— 8.2/100 (25%)Full House Resorts, Inc. currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.
How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.
Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.
Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.
Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.
Asset productivity — how much gross profit each dollar of assets generates.
Free cash flow relative to market value.
Growth
— 33.8/100 (20%)Full House Resorts, Inc. faces growth headwinds with declining or stagnant revenue trends.
Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.
Compound annual revenue growth rate over 3 years.
Year-over-year earnings per share growth.
Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.
Risk
— 2.1/100 (15%)Full House Resorts, Inc. presents elevated risk with concerns around leverage or financial stability.
Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.
Total debt relative to shareholder equity.
Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.
Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.
Valuation
— 0.0/100 (15%)Full House Resorts, Inc. appears expensively valued relative to its fundamentals and growth prospects.
Moat
— 12/100 (30%)Full House Resorts, Inc. operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for FLL.
Score Composition
More Stock Analysis
How is the FLL UQS Score Calculated?
The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Full House Resorts, Inc. is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.
Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.
Moat (25%) assesses Full House Resorts, Inc.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.
Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.
Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.
Valuation (15%) measures whether Full House Resorts, Inc. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.
Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.