EPOW

Industrials

E-Power Inc. Class A · Consulting Services · $20M

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
15.0
Weak

E-Power Inc. Class A scores 15.0/100 using the Balanced preset.

20.0
Quality
35%
3.0
Moat
30%
0.0
Growth
20%
61.9
Risk
15%

EPOW — Key Takeaways

✅ Strengths

E-Power Inc. Class A shows conservative financial structure with manageable risk

⚠️ Areas of Concern

E-Power Inc. Class A has below-average profitability metrics
E-Power Inc. Class A has limited growth momentum
E-Power Inc. Class A has limited competitive moat
E-Power Inc. Class A has stretched valuation metrics

EPOW — Score History

101520Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4Apr 5Apr 6Apr 7Apr 8
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 8, 202615.020.03.00.061.90.00.0
Apr 7, 202615.020.03.00.061.90.00.0
Apr 6, 202615.020.03.00.061.90.00.0
Apr 5, 202615.020.03.00.061.90.00.0
Apr 4, 202615.020.03.00.061.90.00.0
Apr 3, 202615.020.03.00.061.90.00.0
Apr 2, 202615.020.03.00.061.90.0

EPOW — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

20.0/100 (25%)

E-Power Inc. Class A currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.

Capital Efficiency (ROIC)Weak

How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.

Return on EquityStrong

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Cash GenerationWeak

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

0.0/100 (20%)

E-Power Inc. Class A faces growth headwinds with declining or stagnant revenue trends.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

Forward Revenue OutlookWeak

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Risk

61.9/100 (15%)

E-Power Inc. Class A maintains a reasonable risk profile with manageable debt levels.

Financial LeverageStrong

Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.

Debt/EquityStrong

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioWeak

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

0.0/100 (15%)

E-Power Inc. Class A appears expensively valued relative to its fundamentals and growth prospects.

Moat

3/100 (30%)

E-Power Inc. Class A operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for EPOW.

Score Composition

Quality
20.0×25%5.0
Growth
0.0×20%0.0
Risk
61.9×15%9.3
Valuation
0.0×15%0.0
Moat
3.0×30%0.9
Total
15.0Weak

Unlock Full EPOW Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze EPOW in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the EPOW UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for E-Power Inc. Class A is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses E-Power Inc. Class A's competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether E-Power Inc. Class A is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.