Question 1

Is EPD a buy according to UQS?

Accepted Answer

UQS rates EPD as Good at 53.6/100, driven primarily by the Valuation pillar (72.9) and Moat pillar (65.0). The score reflects a balance between an attractive earnings yield of 7.2%, a durable midstream network, and meaningful headwinds: net debt/EBITDA of 3.39 and a three-year revenue CAGR of -3.3%. UQS does not issue buy or sell recommendations — the score is a fundamental ranking tool.

Question 2

What is EPD's PEG ratio and what does it mean?

Accepted Answer

EPD's PEG ratio is 36.72, which is far above the sector median of 0.60 and the conventional 'fairly priced' range of 1–2. However, this figure is analytically distorted — PEG divides P/E by earnings growth, and with TTM EPS growth of -1.1%, the denominator is near zero, producing a meaningless result. The forward P/E of 11.6 and earnings yield of 7.2% are more reliable valuation anchors here. See the [PEG ratio explainer](/learn/peg-ratio).

Question 3

Why might EPD's UQS Score change?

Accepted Answer

The UQS Score updates daily based on trailing twelve-month financials and forward analyst consensus estimates. For EPD, the most sensitive inputs are net debt/EBITDA (currently 3.39, which suppresses the Risk pillar at 30.8) and forward revenue and EPS growth estimates. If leverage decreases or forward estimates are revised upward, the Risk and Growth pillars would likely improve. Deterioration in operating margin or free cash flow would pressure the Quality pillar score of 59.4.

Question 4

How does EPD compare to SLB and E?

Accepted Answer

EPD operates as a fee-based midstream MLP, while SLB (Schlumberger) is an oilfield services company and E (Eni) is an integrated European major — both carry different revenue drivers and capital structures. EPD's ROIC of 10.6% and EV/EBITDA of 11.4x reflect infrastructure-style cash flow stability, whereas SLB and Eni face more direct commodity and services-cycle exposure. The businesses are structurally dissimilar enough that direct UQS pillar comparisons have limited analytical value.

Question 5

What drives EPD's Moat score?

Accepted Answer

Switching costs (15/20) and cost advantage (14/20) lead EPD's moat profile. Switching costs reflect long-term, fee-based contracts that make it operationally and economically difficult for producers and shippers to move volumes to competing infrastructure. Cost advantage stems from the scale and integration of EPD's ~50,000-mile network, which spreads fixed costs across high throughput volumes. Scale & ecosystem (13/20) and network effects (12/20) provide additional reinforcement. See the [economic moat explainer](/learn/economic-moat).

Date	UQS	Quality	Moat	Growth	Risk	Value	Change
May 22, 2026	53.9	57.9	65.0	40.2	29.5	71.1	0.0
May 20, 2026	53.9	57.9	65.0	40.2	29.5	71.2	-3.2
May 9, 2026	57.1	63.9	65.0	21.6	59.2	77.6	+2.6
May 7, 2026	54.5	59.1	65.0	38.7	30.8	74.5	0.0
May 6, 2026	54.5	59.1	65.0	38.7	30.8	73.9	+0.3
May 1, 2026	54.2	59.1	65.0	37.5	30.8	74.0	+0.1
Apr 29, 2026	54.1	59.1	65.0	36.7	30.8	73.9	+0.1
Apr 26, 2026	54.0	59.1	65.0	36.6	30.8	73.9	-0.1
Apr 25, 2026	54.1	59.1	65.0	35.7	30.8	75.4	0.0
Apr 23, 2026	54.1	59.1	65.0	35.7	30.8	75.3	-0.1

EPD

EPD Price History

What if I invested in Enterprise Products Partners L.P.?

Unlock Full EPD Analysis

Pro Analysis

EPD — Score History

EPD — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

Growth

Risk

Valuation

Moat

Score Composition

Financial Data

More Stock Analysis

How is the EPD UQS Score Calculated?