CRCL

Financial Services

Circle Internet Group · Financial - Capital Markets · $24B

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
43.0
Average

Circle Internet Group scores 43.0/100 using the Balanced preset.

6.8
Quality
35%
42.0
Moat
30%
85.0
Growth
20%
44.1
Risk
15%

CRCL — Key Takeaways

✅ Strengths

Circle Internet Group shows solid revenue and earnings growth trajectory

⚠️ Areas of Concern

Circle Internet Group has below-average profitability metrics

CRCL — Score History

35404550Apr 2Apr 3Apr 4Apr 5Apr 6Apr 7Apr 8
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Apr 8, 202643.06.842.085.044.147.70.0
Apr 7, 202643.06.942.085.044.147.70.0
Apr 6, 202643.07.142.085.044.147.70.0
Apr 5, 202643.07.142.085.044.147.70.0
Apr 4, 202643.07.142.085.044.147.60.0
Apr 3, 202643.07.142.085.044.147.60.0
Apr 2, 202643.07.042.085.044.147.5

CRCL — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

6.8/100 (25%)

Circle Internet Group currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.

Return on EquityWeak

Profitability relative to shareholders' equity.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Net ProfitabilityWeak

Bottom-line profit as a share of revenue.

Cash GenerationWeak

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

85.0/100 (20%)

Circle Internet Group is growing rapidly with strong revenue and earnings expansion.

Recent Revenue TrendStrong

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

3Y Revenue CAGRStrong

Compound annual revenue growth rate over 3 years.

EPS GrowthWeak

Year-over-year earnings per share growth.

Forward Revenue OutlookStrong

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Forward EPS GrowthStrong

Analyst consensus for future earnings growth.

Risk

44.1/100 (15%)

Circle Internet Group has some risk factors including moderate leverage or solvency concerns.

Debt/EquityStrong

Total debt relative to shareholder equity.

Current RatioWeak

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

47.7/100 (15%)

Circle Internet Group has a mixed valuation — some metrics suggest fair value while others appear stretched.

Earnings YieldWeak

Inverse of forward P/E — higher yield means cheaper stock.

Price to Free Cash FlowWeak

How many years of FCF the market cap represents.

PEG RatioStrong

P/E relative to earnings growth — lower is more attractive.

Moat

42/100 (30%)

Circle Internet Group possesses some competitive advantages but faces meaningful competition. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for CRCL.

Score Composition

Quality
6.8×25%1.7
Growth
85.0×20%17.0
Risk
44.1×15%6.6
Valuation
47.7×15%7.2
Moat
42.0×30%12.6
Total
43.0Average

Unlock Full CRCL Analysis

Sign in to access detailed financial metrics, interactive price charts, custom pillar weights, 6 investor presets, and watchlist tracking.

✓ Detailed ratios✓ Price chart✓ Custom moat ratings✓ 6 investor presets✓ Watchlist
Analyze CRCL in Detail →

More Stock Analysis

How is the CRCL UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Circle Internet Group is calculated using a proprietary 5-pillar framework with 25 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Circle Internet Group's competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Circle Internet Group is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.