CLNE

Energy

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. · Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · $430M

UQS Score — Balanced Preset
31.3
Below Average

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. scores 31.3/100 using the Balanced preset.

UQS vs Energy Sector
CLNE
31.3
Sector avg
43.5
Quality
Weak
Moat
Weak
Growth
Weak
Risk
Weak
Valuation
Attractive

Unlock Full CLNE Analysis

Sign in to unlock the detailed analysis behind the UQS Score.

  • Detailed 6-pillar UQS breakdown with exact scores
  • All 29 metrics with sector-calibrated comparisons
  • 6 investor presets (Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Wood, Graham, Balanced)
  • Watchlist tracking with score alerts
  • AI-generated investment perspectives across 6 preset views
  • Score history chart with change notifications
Analyze CLNE in Detail →

Pro Analysis

CLNE — Score History

2530354045May 25Jun 12Jun 30Jul 18Aug 5Aug 22
Score changes· 30/43 most recent
DateUQSQualityMoatGrowthRiskValueChange
Aug 19, 202631.325.123.00.036.991.3-3.4
Aug 8, 202634.718.823.00.070.291.3-3.5
Aug 5, 202638.210.323.039.377.369.7-0.1
Jul 31, 202638.310.423.039.377.370.0+0.2
Jul 29, 202638.110.423.039.377.368.8+0.1
Jul 27, 202638.09.823.039.377.368.80.0
Jul 25, 202638.09.823.039.177.369.4+0.1
Jul 24, 202637.99.623.039.177.368.9+0.1
Jul 22, 202637.89.423.039.177.368.5+0.1
Jul 21, 202637.79.323.039.177.368.1+0.4

CLNE — Pillar Breakdown

Quality

25.1/100 (25%)

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. currently shows below-average quality metrics, suggesting challenges with profitability.

Capital Efficiency (ROIC)Weak

How effectively capital is deployed to generate returns.

Operating ProfitabilityWeak

Ability to convert revenue into operating profit.

Cash GenerationStrong

Free cash flow relative to market value.

Growth

0.0/100 (20%)

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. faces growth headwinds with declining or stagnant revenue trends.

Recent Revenue TrendWeak

Revenue trajectory over the last twelve months.

Forward Revenue OutlookWeak

Analyst consensus for future revenue growth.

Risk

36.9/100 (15%)

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has some risk factors including moderate leverage or solvency concerns.

Financial LeverageStrong

Debt levels relative to earnings capacity.

Current RatioWeak

Short-term liquidity — ability to pay near-term obligations.

Interest CoverageWeak

Earnings capacity relative to interest payments.

Valuation

91.3/100 (15%)

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. appears attractively valued relative to its earnings, cash flows, and sector peers.

Price to Free Cash FlowStrong

How many years of FCF the market cap represents.

Moat

23/100 (25%)

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. operates in a highly competitive environment with limited sustainable advantages. The Moat pillar evaluates competitive advantages across five dimensions: Switching Costs, Network Effects, Cost Advantage, Intangible Assets, and Scale & Ecosystem. Sign in to customize moat ratings for CLNE.

Score Composition

Quality
25.1×25%6.3
Growth
0.0×20%0.0
Risk
36.9×15%5.5
Valuation
91.3×15%13.7
Moat
23.0×25%5.8
Total
31.3Below Average

Financial Data

More Stock Analysis

How is the CLNE UQS Score Calculated?

The UQS (Unified Quality Score) for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is calculated using a proprietary 6-pillar framework with 29 financial metrics. Each pillar evaluates a different dimension on a 0–100 scale, then combines into a single weighted score. Scoring thresholds are calibrated per sector. Momentum is an optional Pro toggle — without it, you get the 5-pillar / 25-metric core shown below.

Quality (25%) measures profitability and capital efficiency — ROIC, ROE, margins, GP/Assets, and FCF Yield.

Moat (25%) assesses Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s competitive advantages across switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, intangible assets, and ecosystem scale.

Growth (20%) tracks revenue trajectory and earnings momentum, combining historical results with analyst forward estimates.

Risk (15%) is inversely scored — lower leverage and strong balance sheet health result in higher scores.

Valuation (15%) measures whether Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is fairly priced using earnings yield, price-to-FCF, PEG ratio, and EV/EBITDA relative to sector peers.

Six investor-inspired presets are available, each with different pillar weights: Balanced, Buffett, Munger, Lynch, Cathie Wood, and Graham. The public score shown here uses the Balanced preset. Learn more in our FAQ.